You can do things within a short time frame which you can’t get per V-Ray in the same time frame.
You will have a problem.Įnscape allow to get impressive results within a limited field of project needs. Another example - you are working on a scene and your client needs milky glass. Simple example - planar mirrors doesn’t show the complete interior scene always. Issues are fixed if enough user beg for a solution and the fix isn’t complicated. Per V-Ray you are much more safe.Īlso I was not happy about the weak plugin implementation and that basic issues are not fixed over months/years. But it can happen that Enscape complete fails if you client need a specific effect or quality. Very fast for fly through animations.įor me Enscape was good for some “cheap” projects, where my clients want to get a lot of renderings plus fly throughs for a low budget. Render times are a few seconds or less, but it cost material and render features. The strength of Enscape is the large asset library which allow to fill scene quickly.
Best stable quality and realism for nearly all scenes you get by V-Ray. Enscape is super fast, but materials and quality is limited.
0 kommentar(er)
